The April 11 Wall Street Journal touted the agreement as providing a 30 percent pay increase over three years, a significant stretching of Carter’s 7 percent ceiling on wage increases.

But the Journal’s own figures tell a different story.

Initial reports gave no inkling of how other union demands—which weighted heavier for many Teamsters than the dispute over basic wage rates—fared in the settlement. These included:

• equitable pay rates for owner operators
• restrictions on compulsory overtime, which now forces many truckers to work a seventy-hour week at straight-time pay,
• limits on company “productivity” measures that endanger health and safety. The union asked for guaranteed forty-eight-hour stretches of time off and restrictions on company efforts to increase the size of vans relative to cabs (a significant cause of injuries and deaths in accidents).

“The showdown may come within a week,” warned the Scripps-Howard Washington staff on April 10. It reports the Eisenhower regime is committed to “saving” Indo-China “at all costs.” Similarly the March 31 Wall Street Journal states ominously that “Indo-China will not be allowed to fall into Communists hands—whatever the cost.” It adds: “If the cost is no longer a factor, there is no stopping place.”

No stopping place! That can mean only one thing—another Korea. It means more hundreds of thousands of casualties, broken homes, grief for American families. It means millions of Indo-Chinese men, women, and children burned to death with napalm bombs and blasted to bits by U.S. “strategic bombing” and another country wrecked from end to end as Korea was.

This country has actually been warring against Indo-Chinese independence from the start—since the end of World War II in 1945.  
 
 
Front page (for this issue) | Home | Text-version home